Went to a great event at 92Y this past week, which featured Chelsea Clinton, Republican strategist Nicolle Wallace, EMILY’s List President Stephanie Schrock, and others, who talked about why more women don’t run for office. Check out my post, which ran on The Broad Side, below. Another version was published on genConnect.com. 

Below is the version published on The Broad Side; please click on the link at the bottom to see the story in its entirety.

—–

Who’s getting in our way when it comes to women in elective office? Ourselves, in many cases.

Whether it be doubting that we can win, not wanting to leave our young children at home in the care of others while we’re on the campaign trail or in office, or whether we just don’t think we have what it takes – women are often their own biggest critics.

It’s in our nature to sow feelings of self-doubt, despite the fact that of all people, WE should know better. WE should know that not only can we run for office – and win – but we can literally change history by adding that feminine touch to hot-button policy item and issues that matter most to our communities. After all, don’t most of us hold down demanding jobs while raising kids, making sure school projects and homework are done, keeping the house from looking like a tornado tore through it, attending PTA meetings and soccer practice, and volunteering in our communities, and maintaining family finances?

During an recent event in New York City presented by 92Y and Glamour Magazine, women helping to make inroads in this arena challenged other women to embrace their ambition and not be dissuaded by the critics.

“If you just look at the numbers, it’s not that encouraging, but it IS encouraging … I can tell you, from the feel and the atmosphere and response, there is endless potential for women to be elected in New York City and New York State, in my opinion,” said New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn. “I don’t see at all, any evidence, that gender holds us back. I think what holds us back is ourselves. We decide what we can’t do. We decide what we can’t risk.”

What makes us not take that risk? A 2011 American University study notes that men are 60 percent more likely than women to think of themselves as “very qualified” to run for office, whereas women are more than twice as likely as men to rate themselves as “not at all qualified.” Plus, we’re not the gender amped up to jump into the ring and draw blood.  Being a target of media scrutiny and criticism isn’t exactly a turn-on to many women.

One of the difficult decisions to make is to “be that target” for people’s criticism, said Amy Holmes, news anchor for GBTV’s Real News at the Blaze, former CNN contributor and speechwriter for former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist of Tennessee. “For women, I think that can be a little more difficult decision than it can for men.”

Men like to put “scalps up on their wall” and enjoy the competition, she added, but “to be a woman in public life certainly is not easy – you have to have a very thick skin and be prepared.”

Sandra Fluke is a woman who has such a thick skin.

Click here for the entire article on The Broad Side

I wrote my first piece for The Broad Side last week – a great new online commentary magazine featuring the best writings on the web by women. The Broad Side features real women writing about their real opinion commentary and real political views.

My upcoming article will focus on how New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s model for reforming teacher pay and education could serve other states well, so stay tuned at The Broad Side…

Here’s an excerpt from my first article, which was based on a town-hall even I attended last week in Kearny, N.J., at which I asked Gov. Christie a question about the contraception debate raging in the national – and state- political arena. Please click on the link to The Broad Side for the article in its entirety. Thanks for reading!

The contraception debate has caused women to sit up and take notice of the presidential race, if they weren’t already paying attention. I realize it’s a little hard to get excited about this primary season. But mess with a woman’s reproductive rights and you stir up a hornet’s nest. It has served as fuel for Democrats’ fire and that of organizations such as EMILY’s List and Planned Parenthood, as they continue to hammer away at the Republican presidential hopefuls for their various stances on whether federal mandates on health insurance should cover contraception. The “War on Women” has to be stopped, they argue. Vote Democrat.

The Republican National Committee has fought back with a new ad  called “Obama’s War on Women,” featuring female media personalities like CNN’s Erin Burnett skewering Obama administration and campaign officials about Bill Maher’s remarks about women (like calling Sarah Palin the c-word and referring to a FOX host as a “blonde twink”), given that he donated $1 million to a pro-Obama super PAC. The ad also notes journalist Ron Suskind’s book “Confidence Men: Wall Street, Washington and the Education of a President,” released last year, which highlighted tensions between the Obama administration and women working in and around the White House.

But some high-profile Republicans are saying “move on.”

Click here for the entire article on The Broad Side

Meghan McCain

Meghan McCain thinks New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie can inject some life into the thus-far blah Republican presidential primary.

“The Republicans need someone to excite younger people, independents, Hispanic voters and the disenfranchised. I think if Chris Christie is the vice presidential nominee we can change the weather and have a very good chance of beating Obama,” the Daily Beast blogger and MSNBC contributor told Playboy. “I love that he’s no bullsh-t.”

McCain also said the 2012 election cycle has been “so lame.”

“So many debates, so much blather, so much over saturation.”

Watch: Meghan McCain – ‘I Just Love Any Sort of Ballsy Women’ 

She also talks about Bristol Palin, what it would have been lack had her dad, Sen. John McCain, won the 2008 election against Barack Obama, and being single.

[I won't link to the Playboy interview - I'm confident you can find it yourself;)]

As for Christie, who has been stumping for Mitt Romney, he used to say he would never consider being somebody’s #2 in the White House (given his personality, it IS hard to fathom him being anyone’s No. 2), it seems in recent months he’s changing his tune – something the GOP should be thrilled about.

As questions continue to mount as to whether Mitt Romney can rally enough of the conservative base, there’s more proof that writing off swing and independent voters is a political mistake.

Generally speaking, a “swing voter” is a voter who could support any candidate in an election or party, is not affiliated with any particular party and may vote across party lines. This group is viewed as being able to make or break certain candidates.

An “independent voter” is a swing voter, but pollsters and political experts argue that independent voters are more likely than swing voters to inherently lean left or right, and are more likely to be no-shows at the polls.

“Ignore Swing Voters at Your Peril!” warns William Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a contributing editor for The New Republic.

“Even in these hyperpolarized times, there are lots of voters who remain open to a politics of persuasion—more than enough to determine the outcome—and campaigns ignore them at their peril,” Galston says.

Linda Killian, a Washington journalist and a senior scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, recently published her book, The Swing Vote: The Untapped Power of Independents. An excerpt on The Atlantic highlights the undeniably increasing power independent voters have, noting that 30 percent of all American voters now consider themselves independent – the largest number of independent voters in 70 years, and a bigger group than those who say they are either Republican or Democrat.

Read the rest of this entry

Howard Dean

It’s not very often I find myself in complete agreement with Howard Dean.

But today, during his on-air MSNBC commentary about the Republican presidential candidates and how they have “completely alienated the independents in this country,” I found myself sitting there nodding my head. “Yes!”

In their effort to curry favor with that all-too important conservative base, any of the candidates who may have even a whiff of independent-thinking in them on social issues, in particular, have said what they think conservatives want to hear. GOP candidates are currying favor with the ”very far right social agendas,” Dean said. Obama campaign advisor David Axelrod was pushing a similar message to reporters this week, so this is clearly part of Obama’s strategy – to paint his potential opponents as so far out of the mainstream one couldn’t possibly vote for them.

Up until recently, many would agree that of them all – Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, and Ron Paul – Romney had the biggest independent streak of them all. Then the contraception debate reared its ugly head, and Rush Limbaugh and Sandra Fluke stole the spotlight away from issues Romney would rather focus on, like jobs and the economy.

“He could have redefined himself on that one thing,” Dean, said of the Fluke-Limbaugh ordeal; that was Romney’s chance to call Limbaugh out for the [INSERT YOUR FAVORITE CHOICE WORD FOR LIMBAUGH HERE] that he is and, at the very least, make some gesture that said “this guy doesn’t represent my beliefs.”

But he didn’t. And he didn’t make a strong, pro-woman stance in the broader contraception debate, either.

 

Romney’s latest lean right seems to be paying off.

Read the rest of this entry

In case you’re wondering whether New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has changed his stance on how New Jersey should try to legalize gay marriage, think again.

During a talk on education in Fort Lee, NJ, on Friday with MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough and former Washington, D.C. School Chancellor and founder of StudentsFirst Michelle Rhee, Christie was asked by someone in the audience what his plan was on gay marriage.

“I think marriage is between one man and one woman,” Christie said. “Let’s put it on the ballot.”

Christie has taken heat for wanting to put the issue to voters via the ballot, instead of passing a law through the state Legislature. Earlier this week, Christie vetoed legislation to legalize same-sex marriages.

“if the majority of people want to have same-sex marriage, then vote for it,” he said. “But I don’t think it’s a decision that should be made by 121 people in Trenton alone.

“I’m willing to be governed by the will of the people of New Jersey.

Read the rest of this entry

I just heard what may be one of the most accurate descriptions of the candidates in the GOP primary to date.

Chip Scutari, a former Arizona Republic political reporter-turned political consultant who makes up one-half of Scutari and Cieslak bipartisan public relations firm, told MSNBC today that he was in no way, shape, or form, in love with any one of the Republican presidential hopefuls: Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich, or Ron Paul.

“When I look at these four candidates, it’s like going to a seventh grade dance and all the pretty, popular girls went skiing for the weekend and we’re left with the rest of the crowd.”

As voters in Michigan and Arizona go to the polls today, the former could be a make-or-break state for Romney, in particular. But even if Romney loses Michigan, he’s signaling that doesn’t mean he’s dropping out of the race.

“This is not going to be over in a day or two,” the Michigan native said today.

Read the rest of this entry

As I’m sweating away on the elliptical machine at the gym today (I still have some baby weight that just…won’t…come…off!! Seriously – it’s been almost 2 years since I had my son, it’s killing me!)…Anyway, I digress…

I was reading a recent issue of New York magazine and came across an article that offers hope for a real third party one day soon. John Heilemann, the magazine’s national affairs editor, recently spoke with Kahlil Byrd, who  is CEO of Americans Elect, the organization striving to launch an actual independent presidential candidate in 2021 via online voting, bypassing the traditional nominating process.

I already knew about Americans Elect but was wondering why it hadn’t captured more attention until now. Former New Jersey Gov. Christine Todd Whitman made headlines in the New Jersey papers here in December when she joined Americans Elect. The group plans to pick its nominee in June after an online nominating convention in which anyone can participate.

Read the rest of this entry

Rep. Cliff Stearns is the Florida Republican who launched the U.S. House investigation into Planned Parenthood last fall. It is that investigation which ultimately led to the Susan G. Komen Foundation pulling funding for Planned Parenthood breast cancer screenings, then reversing its decision after several days of public outcry.

In an interview with FOX News Thursday, Stearns noted that while Planned Parenthood has been around for 50 years, this is the first time Congress has really tried to look at its finances. There is concern that federal money is being used by the organization to help pay for abortions.

“We’re doing a financial oversight investigation,” Stearns said before Komen reversed its decision [video below]. “Planned Parenthood gets roughly $487 million – roughly half a billion dollars – a year from taxpayers and all I’m saying is, where is this money going?’”

Read the rest of this entry

Susan G. Komen asked to ignore ‘partisan witch hunt’ of congressional investigation into Planned Parenthood; Twitter, Facebook abuzz

UPDATE: Susan G. Komen has decided to continue funding Planned Parenthood’s breast exams after a huge public outcry that led to a windfall of donations to Planned Parenthood.

“We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives,” the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation said in a statement.

“We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood.  They were not.

“Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.”

Read the rest of this entry

Facebook Like Button for Dummies